Evaluation of Patients with Pain Following Total HipReplacement
by Patrick J. Duffy, Bassam A. Masri, Donald S. Garbuz, and Clive P. Duncan
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Volume 87(11):2566-2575
November 1, 2005
©2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Technetium-99 methylene diphosphonate-labeled scan showing increased uptake around acemented femoral implant.
Patrick J. Duffy et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2566-2575
©2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Indium-labeled white blood-cell scan showing increased uptake around the same implant asshown in Figure 1.
Patrick J. Duffy et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2566-2575
©2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Computerized tomography evaluation of the rotational stability of a femoral prosthesis.
Patrick J. Duffy et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2566-2575
©2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Magnetic resonance arthrogram showing the acetabular component and the femoral head of aright total hip replacement.
Patrick J. Duffy et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2566-2575
©2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Algorithm for evaluation of radiographically loose implants.
Patrick J. Duffy et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2566-2575
©2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Algorithm for evaluation of radiographically stable implants.
Patrick J. Duffy et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2566-2575
©2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.