Strider Road Safety Seminar Bristol, 19 May 2015Ellen Townsend, Policy Director
European Federation of Road Traffic Victims (FEVR)
Finnish Transport Safety Agency
Safer Roads Foundation
Chalmers University of Technology
Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS)
Confederation of Organisations in Road Transport Enforcement (CORTE)
Road and Safety, Poland
Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
Association Prévention Routière
Folksam Research
Liikenneturva
Confederación Nacional de Autoescuelas (CNAE) (ES)
Centre for Transport and Logistics (CTL), Sapienza – University of Rome
Belgian Road Safety Institute
Transport Infrastructure, Systems and Policy Group (TISPG), Portugal
Swedish Abstaining Motorists’ Association (MHF)
Road Safety Institute – Panos Mylonas, Greece
Road Safety Authority, Ireland
Austrian Road Safety Board – KFV
MOVING International Road Safety Association
Austrian Road Safety Board – KFV
MOVING International Road Safety Association
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds
Finnish Motor Insurers’ Centre
Dutch Safety Board
P.A.U. Education
Fundación MAPFRE
Auto und Reiseclub Deutschland
International Motorcycling Federation
Road Traffic Safety Agency of the Republic of Serbia
Global Road Safety Partnership
Hellenic Institute of Transport – Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH)
Norwegian Abstaining Motorists’ Association
Danish Road Safety Council
German Road Safety Council / Deutscher Verkehrssicherheitsrat (DVR)
Motor Transport Institute, Poland
Region Midtjylland – Central Region Denmark
Czech Transport Research Center
Swiss Council for Accident Prevention
Catalan Traffic Service (SCT)
VdTÜV
Flemish Foundation for Traffic Knowledge
Centro Studi Città Amica (CeSCAm), University of Brescia
Vehicle Technology Research Centre, University of Birmingham
Norwegian Council for Road Safety
Transport Safety Research Centre, Loughborough University
Slovenian Traffic Safety Agency
OUR MEMBERS
2586BR
Monitoring EU transportsafety policy
Road SafetyPerformance Index (PIN)
Ranking EU countries‘performances
SAFE & SOBER
C:\Documents and Settings\owner\Desktop\Alcolock pictures\ACS_alcolock_v3.jpg
iSAFER_logo_small.jpg
logo_praise_rgb-300x200.jpg
Logo-Bikepal-300x200.png
 
25,700
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
 k
i
l
l
e
d
 a
s
 a
c
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
 o
f
 r
o
a
d
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
E
U
2
8
 (
2
0
1
4
)
 
199,000
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
 b
y
 p
o
l
i
c
e
 a
s
 s
e
r
i
o
u
s
l
y
i
n
j
u
r
e
d
 f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
 t
r
a
f
f
i
c
 c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
E
U
2
8
 (
2
0
1
3
)
 
18.7 billion 
 
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
i
o
n
 o
f
 t
o
t
a
l
 v
a
l
u
e
 o
f
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
 i
n
 r
o
a
d
 d
e
a
t
h
s
 i
n
t
h
e
 E
U
2
8
 2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
3
% reductionin road deaths2001-2013 andPIN Awards
% change in road deaths 2010-2013
1. Slovakia - 37%2. Spain      - 32%
3. Greece    - 31%
ETSC (2014) 8th PIN Annual Report
Road mortality (per mln inhabitants) in2013
ETSC (2014) 8th PIN Annual Report
Drink and Drug Driving
Up to 2% of kilometres with an illegalBlood Alcohol Concentration
25% of all road deaths across the EUare alcohol-related
Zero Tolerance
Adopt common approach for drugdriving enforcement
http://s236.photobucket.com/albums/ff100/imagercc1/archive/page2/drinkanddrive_700.jpg
BAC limits acrossthe EU
An increasing number ofcountries are lowering theirBAC limits to be in line withEU recommendation 2001 onmaximum BAC legal limit
18 EU countries apply lowerBAC for novice drivers(0.0 – 0.2)
18 EU countries apply lowerBAC for professional drivers(0.0 to 0.2 BAC)
Standard BAC
BAC
Commercial drivers
BAC
Novice Drivers
Austria
0.5
0.1
0.1
Belgium
0.5
0.2
0.5
Bulgaria
0.5
0.5
0.5
Cyprus
0.22
0.22
0.22
Czech
0.0
0.0
0.0
Denmark
0.5
0.5
0.5
Estonia
0.2
0.2
0.2
Finland
0.22
0.22
0.22
France
0.5
0.5 (0.2 busdrivers)
0.5
Germany
0.5
0.0
0.0
Greece
0.5
0.2
0.2
Hungary
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ireland
0.5
0.5
0.2
Italy
0.5
0.0
0.0
Latvia
0.5
0.5
0.2
Lithuania
0.4
0.2
0.2
Luxembourg
0.5
0.2
0.2
Malta
0.8
0.8
0.8
Netherlands
0.5
0.5
0.2
Poland
0.2
0.2
0.2
Portugal
0.5
0.5
0.5
Romania
0.0
0.0
0.0
Slovakia
0.0
0.0
0.0
Slovenia
0.5
0.0
0.0
Spain
0.5
0.3
0.3
Sweden
0.2
0.2
0.2
UK*
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.5 in Scotland!
Awareness needs to be reinforced
Eurobarometer, Oct. 2010
On average only27% ofrespondentsknew the legalBAC limit
36% gave awrong answer
37% did notknow
Positive checks per 1000 population
Numbers of positive checks per 1,000 populationin the most recent year (2010)
CY
SI
FR
BE
AT
PL
HU
PT
FI
EL
BG
IE
ES
11.6
9.3
6.0
5.0
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.1
3.9
3.1
3.0
2.4
2.0
LV
SE
DK
RO
GB
IL
SK
LT
NO
CZ
EE
IT
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.2
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
Being checked for dring drinkdriving is the exception:maximum 1 in 5 driverschecked in one year
Sartre (2007): Only 26% ofdrivers in the EU were checked
Many drivers under theinfluence are hard coredrinkers
Drink Driving EnforcementRecommendations
Introduce targeted breathtesting.
Intensify enforcement of drinkdriving laws by setting targetse.g. 1 in 5 motorists.
Implement a roadsideevidential breath testing.
Increasingly used across Europe.
Reoffending rates in Finlandreduced from 30% to 6% with use ofinterlocks.
Already compulsory on schoolbuses in France and Finland.
Should be mandatory for professionalvehicles and all cars should have astandard interface to enable use whenneeded.
ALCOHOL INTERLOCKS
THE PRAISE PROJECT
Advancing knowledge onthe need for work-relatedroad safety management.Advancing knowledge onthe need for work-relatedroad safety management.
Advancing knowledge onthe need for work-relatedroad safety management.Advancing knowledge onthe need for work-relatedroad safety management.
Drug Driving
Many drugs influence the driving fitness.
The use of illegal (for example cannabis) orpsychoactive substances and medicinal drugs whilstdriving is a cause for concern.
The DRUID project, aimed to fill gaps in theknowledge base, thereby enabling the developmentof harmonised, EU-wide regulations for driving underthe influence of alcohol, drugs and medicine.
Driving under the influence of drink, drugs andmedicines is also targeted in the EU drugs strategy2013-16.
Drug Driving – National Level
Vary greatly, from zero tolerancelaws to impairement laws.
Prevention programmes thataddress drugs and driving are inplace in the form of training indriving schools as well as variouspublic safety campaigns, thoughthese may not always be effectivelytargeted.
ETSC Recommendations
Disseminate effective information on theeffects of medicinal and illicit drugs ondriving.
Stress the role of doctors in advisingdrivers on the impact of prescriptionmedicines on driving.
Enforcement of drug driving towill lead to detection and severesanctions.
Questions for you?
http://www.netsuiteblogs.com/Websites/netsuiteblog/images/blog/2014/8questions_blog1.jpg
www.etsc.eu
@etsc_eu
ellen.townsend@etsc.eu